- Registration Time
- 2009-6-9
- Lastest login
- 2011-9-27
- Read Permission
- 30
- Points
- 286
- Digest
- 0
- Posts
- 15
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b76bd/b76bd43868b2ed949c2e03ca53c01cbc73a49341" alt="Rank: 3" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd7f/cfd7fd9ed4e9adb811a030de2904724d0b7a8354" alt="Rank: 3"
|
I think something goes wrong with our current college examination.
[url=]Today I finished my exam of [/url][url=]European Culture[/url]: an Introduction, which is only one of the subjects that go wrong in the examination. Before the exam, the teacher gives us an outline in which nearly all the examination questions are included. What we need to do is to pick out the answers in the text book and then recite them. So it can be concluded that when you take the exam, you just put down what you have remembered onto the exam paper, and the better you recite, the higher the score you will get. That is the problem.
Many students do not show up on the class, or even if they do they do not listen to the class. When the exam comes, they just recite, and usually they can pass and sometimes get a high score. Another intolerable thing is the cheating. It is usually the fact that after the exam, the students will forgot all the things they recite quickly. So what the significance of the course? Just for the students to know there is such a course?
Take European Culture for example. It is a course covering a lot of spheres, such as literature, philosophy, politics, economy, music, architecture, science and so on. So it is not an easy-learning subject. But some students still get high scores. However, does a high score mean the student has well master the course? No! If the teacher does not give an outline about the exam, those who have got a high score may even fail the exam.
Therefore, we must reconsider the current college examination. How do you think of it?
Thanks. |
|