However， the government does not concern me much， and I shall bestow the fewest possible thoughts on it.  It is not many moments that I live under a government， even in this world.  If a man is thought-free， fancy-free， imagination-free， that which is not never for a long time appearing to be to him， unwise rulers or reformers cannot fatally interrupt him.

　　I know that most men think differently from myself； but those whose lives are by profession devoted to the study of these or kindred subjects， content me as little as any.  Statesmen and legislators， standing so completely within the institution， never distinctly and nakedly behold it.  They speak of moving society， but have no resting-place without it.  They may be men of a certain experience and discrimination， and have no doubt invented ingenious and even useful systems， for which we sincerely thank them； but all their wit and usefulness lie within certain not very wide limits. They are wont to forget that the world is not governed by policy and expediency.  Webster never goes behind government， and so cannot speak with authority about it.  His words are wisdom to those legislators who contemplate no essential reform in the existing government； but for thinkers， and those who legislate for all time，he never once glances at the subject.  I know of those whose serene and wise speculations on this theme would soon reveal the limits of his mind's range and hospitality.  Yet， compared with the cheap professions of most reformers， and the still cheaper wisdom and eloquence of politicians in general， his are almost the only sensible and valuable words， and we thank Heaven for him. Comparatively， he is always strong， original， and， above all，practical.  Still， his quality is not wisdom， but prudence.  The lawyer's truth is not truth， but consistency or a consistent expediency.  Truth is always in harmony with herself， and is not concerned chiefly to reveal the justice that may consist with wrong-doing.  He well deserves to be called， as he has been called，the Defender of the Constitution.  There are really no blows to be given by him but defensive ones.  He is not a leader， but a follower.  His leaders are the men of '87.  "I have never made an effort，" he says， "and never propose to make an effort； I have never countenanced an effort， and never mean to countenance an effort， to disturb the arrangement as originally made， by which the various States came into the Union."  Still thinking of the sanction which the Constitution gives to slavery， he says， "Because it was a part of the original compact ―― let it stand."  Notwithstanding his special acuteness and ability， he is unable to take a fact out of its merely political relations， and behold it as it lies absolutely to be disposed of by the intellect ―― what， for instance， it behooves a man to do here in America to-day with regard to slavery，but ventures， or is driven， to make some such desperate answer as the following， while professing to speak absolutely， and as a private man ―― from which what new and singular code of social duties might be inferred？  "The manner，" says he， "in which the governments of those States where slavery exists are to regulate it is for their own consideration， under their responsibility to their constituents， to the general laws of propriety， humanity， and justice， and to God.  Associations formed elsewhere， springing from a feeling of humanity， or any other cause， have nothing whatever to do with it.  They have never received any encouragement from me， and they never will."

　　They who know of no purer sources of truth， who have traced up its stream no higher， stand， and wisely stand， by the Bible and the Constitution， and drink at it there with reverence and humility； but they who behold where it comes trickling into this lake or that pool， gird up their loins once more， and continue their pilgrimage toward its fountain-head.

　　No man with a genius for legislation has appeared in America. They are rare in the history of the world.  There are orators，politicians， and eloquent men， by the thousand； but the speaker has not yet opened his mouth to speak who is capable of settling the much-vexed questions of the day.  We love eloquence for its own sake， and not for any truth which it may utter， or any heroism it may inspire.  Our legislators have not yet learned the comparative value of free-trade and of freedom， of union， and of rectitude， to a nation.  They have no genius or talent for comparatively humble questions of taxation and finance， commerce and manufacturers and agriculture.  If we were left solely to the wordy wit of legislators in Congress for our guidance， uncorrected by the seasonable experience and the effectual complaints of the people， America would not long retain her rank among the nations.  For eighteen hundred years， though perchance I have no right to say it， the New Testament has been written； yet where is the legislator who has wisdom and practical talent enough to avail himself of the light which it sheds on the science of legislation？

　　The authority of government， even such as I am willing to submit to ―― for I will cheerfully obey those who know and can do better than I， and in many things even those who neither know nor can do so well ―― is still an impure one： to be strictly just， it must have the sanction and consent of the governed.  It can have no pure right over my person and property but what I concede to it.  The progress from an absolute to a limited monarchy， from a limited monarchy to a democracy， is a progress toward a true respect for the individual. Even the Chinese philosopher was wise enough to regard the individual as the basis of the empire.  Is a democracy， such as we know it， the last improvement possible in government？  Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man？  There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power， from which all its own power and authority are

更多 英文美文、英語美文、英文短文、英語短文，請繼續關注 英語作文大全