想要在GRE作文部分的考試中寫出優(yōu)秀的文章，論據(jù)素材是重要的一環(huán)。好的論據(jù)不僅能幫助你支撐觀點，加強說服力，還能體現(xiàn)出考生在閱讀量上的積累和深厚扎實的語言功底基礎(chǔ)。特別是ISSUE作文，更是需要大量好素材作為儲備，才能保證考生無論遭遇那種題目，都能游刃有余地完成一篇高分作文的寫作。小編為大家整理了GRE ISSUE作文各類題目的精品優(yōu)質(zhì)素材，一起來看吧。

文學評論現(xiàn)狀

Today interest in literary theory and Continental philosophy coexists in university literature

departments with a more conservative literary criticism of which the New Critics would probably have approved. Acrimonious disagreements over the goals and methods of literary criticism, which characterized both sides taken by critics during the “rise” of theory, have declined (though they still happen), and many critics feel that they now have a great plurality of methods and approaches from which to choose.

Some critics work largely with theoretical texts, while others read traditional literature; interest in the literary canon is still great, but many critics are also interested in minority and women’s literatures, while some critics influenced by cultural studies read popular texts like comic books or pulp/genre fiction. Ecocritics have drawn connections between literature and the natural sciences. Many literary critics also work in film criticism or media studies. Some write intellectual history; others bring the results and methods of social history to bear on reading literature.

文學的哲學

Strictly speaking, the philosophy of literature is a branch of aesthetics, the branch of philosophy that deals with the question, “what is art?” Much of aesthetic philosophy has traditionally focused on the plastic arts or music, however, at the expense of the verbal arts. In fact, much traditional discussion of aesthetic philosophy seeks to establish criteria of artistic quality that are indifferent to the subject matter being depicted. Since all literary works, almost by definition, contain notional content, aesthetic theories that rely on purely formal qualities tend to overlook literature.

文學理論分類

Since theorists of literature often draw on a very heterogeneous tradition of Continental philosophy and the philosophy of language, any classification of their approaches is only an approximation. There are many “schools” or types of literary theory, which take different approaches to understanding texts. Most theorists, even among those listed below, combine methods from more than one of these approaches (for instance, the deconstructive approach of Paul de Man drew on a long tradition of close reading pioneered by the New Critics, and de Man was trained in the European hermeneutic tradition).

文學理論和文學

One of the fundamental questions of literary theory is “What is literature?”, though many contemporary theorists and literary scholars believe either that “l(fā)iterature” cannot be defined or that it can refer to any use of language. Specific theories are distinguished not only by their

methods and conclusions, but even by how they define a “text”. For some scholars of literature, “texts” comprises little more than “books belonging to the Western literary canon.” But the principles and methods of literary theory have been applied to non-fiction, popular fiction, film, historical documents, law, advertising, etc., in the related field of cultural studies. In fact, some scholars within cultural studies treat cultural events, like fashion or football riots, as “texts” to be interpreted. By this measure, literary theory can be thought of as the general theory of interpretation.

更多 GRE作文、GRE寫作模板，請繼續(xù)關(guān)注 英語作文大全