GRE寫(xiě)作Issue部分精品素材分享之科技作用
想要在GRE作文部分的考試中寫(xiě)出優(yōu)秀的文章,論據(jù)素材是重要的一環(huán)。好的論據(jù)不僅能幫助你支撐觀點(diǎn),加強(qiáng)說(shuō)服力,還能體現(xiàn)出考生在閱讀量上的積累和深厚扎實(shí)的語(yǔ)言功底基礎(chǔ)。特別是ISSUE作文,更是需要大量好素材作為儲(chǔ)備,才能保證考生無(wú)論遭遇那種題目,都能游刃有余地完成一篇高分作文的寫(xiě)作。小編為大家整理了GRE ISSUE作文各類題目的精品優(yōu)質(zhì)素材,一起來(lái)看吧。
科技改變了社會(huì)關(guān)系
Technology, particularly the Internet, is definitely helping change social relations, but not in ways that its critics suggest. Castells describes the impact of the Internet as people organize themselves into a social network. “Networked individualism”, as he describes it,“is a social pattern, not a collection of isolated individuals.” Individuals will build networks, both on-line and off-line, based on their interests, values, affinities, and projects. Because of the capabilities of the Internet for communication, people will build virtual communities that are different from physical communities. These communities, however, are not necessarily less intense or less effective in binding and mobilizing people. Furthermore, a communication hybrid is now developing in our societies, bringing together both the physical and the virtual space as the material support of networked individualism.
科技是否導(dǎo)致了人情疏離
Given its negative effects on individuals, shouldn’t the Internet simply be banned? Technology is not the sole culprit. Robert Putnam has documented a decline in civic engagement and social participation in the US in the past 35 years, resulting in major consequences on both the societal and the individual level. This is a major concern. As Putnam writes, the quality of governance is determined by longstanding traditions of civic engagement (or its absence). Voter turnout, newspaper readership, membership in choral societies and football clubs...are the hallmarks of a successful region. In fact, historical analysis suggested that these networks of organized reciprocity and civic solidarity, far from being an epiphenomenon of socioeconomic modernization, were a precondition for it.
科學(xué)發(fā)明依賴于過(guò)去的知識(shí)積累
Individual scientific inventions do not simply spring out of the blue. They build on past accomplishments in an incremental manner and give a conscious form to the subconscious knowledge that society gathers over time. As the pioneer is more conscious than the surrounding community, his inventions normally meet with initial resistance which receded over time as his inventions gain wider acceptance. If the opposition is stronger than the pioneer, then the introduction of his invention gets delayed. In medieval times when guilds exercised tight control over their members, progress in medical invention was slow mainly because physicians were secretive about their remedies. When Denis Papin demonstrated his invention of a steam engine, German naval authorities refused to accept it, fearing it would lead to increased unemployment.
科學(xué)的公開(kāi)性
A very broad issue affecting the neutrality of science concerns the areas over which science chooses to explore, so what part of the world and man is studied by science. Since the areas for science to investigate are theoretically infinite, the issue then arises as to what science should attempt to question or find out.
Philip Kitcher in his Science, Truth, and Democracy argues that scientific studies that attempt to show one segment of the population as being less intelligent, successful or emotionally backward compared to others have a political feedback effect which further excludes such groups from access to science. Thus such studies undermine the broad consensus required for good science by excluding certain people, and so proving themselves in the end to be unscientific.
更多 GRE作文、GRE寫(xiě)作模板,請(qǐng)繼續(xù)關(guān)注 英語(yǔ)作文大全
本文地址:http://www.hengchuai.cn/writing/englishtest/gre/49226.html